I always admired Senator Howard Baker of Tennessee, and never really understood why he wasn't able to garner more support in his presidential runs. The biggest reason I admired him was for the way he treated his colleagues (all of them - Democrat and Republican) in debate. In today's world of politics, it just seems to be all about slinging mud. Senator Baker always let his arguments stand (or fail) on their merits concerning the issue at hand, and always did so while treating those who disagreed with dignity and respect.
I'll also give a nod to former Virginia Governor Mark Warner. When he ran for the post, I did not vote for him. I didn't even give it a great deal of consideration, as he struck me as a carpet bagger. But, he used those four years in office to convince me, as well as throngs of others here in the Old Dominon, that he was a most capable chief executive for this state. He flat out broke one of his campaign promises regarding raising taxes. But, he had the gonads to tell you that he was going to break that promise, and provided sound rationale for why he was doing it. Without question, he left the Commonwealth in much better shape than he found. I'd love to see him have a shot at the presidency in 2008. However, I fear that - even if he does - the Democrats will screw it up by forcing him (or whoever their nominee is, for that matter) to try and cater to that entire bucket of rainbow stew that they call a party. And, I just don't see this nation electing a president that is going to do that.
By the way, great call on Goldwater, Lazarus.