Re: Bazemore given walking papers
10/11/2007 12:04 PM
OK, I've read the news release again on NHRA.com and although I have no real evidence to back this up, WesternStar's "cannonfodder" comment did have me kinda reading behind the words. It appears nowhere that I see other than the usual "we want to move in a different direction for the future" that Whit was released "for cause" being some contractual breech. Now, there was no written contract and this IMO is where it gets interesting. Ironic this happens now when over the last several months Whit was pushing for a written contract.
For most of the year, Hot Rod Fuller's car was run out of pocket rather than sponsor money and from what was said, right before Cat came on board, the well was about dry. Now Whit is no new comer to driving and good or bad he does command name presence and that does come at a price for a team owner making payroll. I'd also guess that coming in new to TF that instead of commanding a nice upfront salary, that a lesser salary was agreed and then built in incentives were in place if certain levels of performance were met.
No one back in Pomona expected much from Whit this first year as he was an unknown element to the TFer and most expected a learning curve. Whit had his bumps but was a fast enough learner to everyone's surprise to make the Countdown. Did that trigger certain incentives to kick in but contingent that he complete the entire year? Ah-Ha! See where I'm going with this.
DPR had it's pockets drained fielding an unsponsored car for the bulk of the year and Whit may of in effect by his performance priced himself out of a job. Had he made the Coundown to 2, it's possible he may have stayed in as his potential at worst a 4th place finish in the points may have paid the difference in the incentives areas, etc. Now that this option is gone, the money to pay Whit for a completed year may not be there and thus the reason DPR pulled the trigger. And it appears Matco is in the boat on this too.
Again, this is absolute pure speculation on my part and may in reality have nothing to do with the facts but in the business world that is drag racing and for that matter all forms of motorsports, this may indeed be the sad truth. Drag Racing since the beginning has been about performance and putting the best car, driver and crew out there to win races. Other racing venues have seen plenty of "also ran" cars with absolutely no chance of winning and in some cases marginal chances of qualifying but the driver either had name standing because of past performance or they were excellent public spokespersons or they had eye candy appeal and there are both male and female examples of this so don't think I'm pointing fingers at a specific gender. Racing has become as much if not more so about advertising and making a buck based on a business plan than it is about winning races and setting records. It's become a rolling billboard sport and they either move in circles at 200 mph, make left and right turns or in our case go in a straight line. If you can't step up and fit into that mold and show a sponsor real return on investment, then do not dare venture out onto that track because you'll disappear faster than a John Force FC with a Austin Coil super tuneup in a race for all the marbles!
Again JMO.